বৃহস্পতিবার, ২ মে, ২০১৩

Seattle researchers fear federal cuts will cost lives and jobs

Susie Fitzhugh

Dr. Fred Appelbaum, director of the Clinical Research Division of Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center in Seattle and head of the Division of Medical Oncology at the University of Washington. He has also served as the executive director of the Seattle Cancer Care Alliance since its formation in 1998.

Seattle scientists are worried that lives and jobs will be lost if federal budget cuts to cancer and health care research aren?t reversed.

The issue brought together a number of experts Tuesday at the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center to meet with U.S. Sen. Patty Murray (D-Wash.), for a discussion on sequestration cuts to the National Institutes of Health (NIH).

The NIH provides about $300 million a year to The Hutch in research grants. Institute leadership is anticipating losing 5 percent of that funding, amounting to a $15 million cut.

?We?re going to have some major cuts,? said Dr. Fred Appelbaum, director of the clinical research division at the Hutch. ?There?s no question. We will have layoffs and other cost savings measure that will painful.?

The Hutch is working on its annual budget process right now, and details of where cuts will happen won?t be available for a few weeks.

While the grants subject to cuts are awarded individually to projects and research leaders, Appelbaum said cuts from the top are likely as the institution prepares for the financial hit.

In the meantime, researchers have been ?squirreling away? funds where they can to ensure current projects can afford to keep going, he said.

Murray said she would bring the message of researchers back to Congress, and that she objected to the cuts.

?I am adamant that sequestration is the wrong cuts, wrong time,? she said.

Still, Appelbaum wasn?t confident that Congress would reverse the cuts in time.

?I?m personally very pessimistic,? he said. ?I have to be honest, I have not seen (positive) signs or messages from Congress.?

Valerie Bauman covers nonprofits and health care for the Puget Sound Business Journal.

Source: http://feeds.bizjournals.com/~r/bizj_seattle/~3/fPFuAeLuvqs/cancer-researchers-fear-federal-cuts.html

London Olympics Kristen Stewart Rupert Sanders Photos 2016 Olympics TD Bank mountain lion hanley ramirez Christian Bale visits victims

Viacom 2Q profits fall, but beats expectations

(AP) ? Viacom is reporting an 18 percent drop in second-quarter net income due to lower revenue, especially from its filmed entertainment division that includes Paramount Pictures.

That still topped Wall Street expectations, however.

Viacom on Wednesday posted earnings of $478 million, or 96 cents per share, in the January-March period. That's down from $585 million, or $1.07 per share, in the same period a year earlier.

Revenue fell 6 percent to $3.14 billion from $3.33 billion.

Analysts, on average, had expected earnings of 95 cents per share on revenue of $3.18 billion, according to FactSet.

Viacom Inc., based in New York, owns MTV, VH1, Comedy Central and other TV brands.

Associated Press

Source: http://hosted2.ap.org/APDEFAULT/495d344a0d10421e9baa8ee77029cfbd/Article_2013-05-01-Earns-Viacom/id-a19315f347a347febad422d10c56fc7f

Stonewall Inaugural Ball julio jones j crew san francisco 49ers san francisco 49ers stan musial

Chinese manufacturing growth slows in April (Financial Times)

Sorry, Readability was unable to parse this page for content.

Source: http://news.feedzilla.com/au/stories/business/302721522?client_source=feed&format=rss

taraji p. henson shuttle discovery bonnie raitt internal revenue service intc tupac andrew shaw

Debt Consolidation vs Debt Negotiation

Consolidation companies will take the view that debt consolidation versus debt negotiation is not really two different things. Most companies can and will offer both services. Not only will they consolidate bills into one payment but they will negotiate with creditors for lower interest rates and cancellation of fees. They will assist with consolidation and repayment of the debt but this is not truly negotiation. It is important for the individual to understand exactly what service is available and how it will be utilized to increase credit and reduce debt.

When viewed from the negotiation side, this argument can be seen as something totally different. Negotiation involves bargaining with creditors for a smaller payoff amount. Most creditors are willing to settle for a reduced amount if the amount is paid in full. Negotiation services will work with the consumer to find the middle ground. This can be a long process, taking as long as 6 months to a year. Once a consumer determines what they can reasonably pay, the company will make a proposal for the individual to creditors. The consumer must have the money in the bank waiting when a settlement is reached as payment is needed immediately.

Because these two options are quite different, they will have different effects on a credit report. Negotiation may not repair credit but it will show that the consumer has paid the obligations in full which can go a long way with future creditors. Consolidation is usually reflected on a credit report as being in counseling. Some creditors view this as a positive step, especially since timely payments are reestablished. They may remove all negative information once the consumer has completed a consolidation program, but this varies by creditor. Reviewing the effects on the credit report is just one of many ways that the debt consolidation versus debt negotiation debate can be viewed.

This subject can be debated from a Biblical viewpoint. Some people may feel it is best to pay off everything that is owed, which is only accomplished with consolidation. Others feel that things like interest and fees are not necessarily valid obligations that must be paid back. No matter which side of the debate a person falls on, it is up to the individual to come to a final conclusion about spending habits. Isaiah 55:2 warns people about spending "Wherefore do ye spend money for that which is not bread? and your labour for that which satisfieth not? hearken diligently unto me, and eat ye that which is good, and let your soul delight itself in fatness." When debating whether to choose debt consolidation versus debt negotiation, a Christian consumer must take the words and teachings of the Bible to heart and make their own conclusions.

Source: http://www.christianet.com/debtsettlement/consolidationvsdebtnegotiation.htm

horsetail falls ice t new york knicks president day lin j.r. smith espn jeremy lin

বুধবার, ১ মে, ২০১৩

Academic Excellence and St. Stephen's College: A response by ...

This is a guest post by THANE RICHARD

I recently read an article in Kafila ? more like an angry, reflective rant ? written by some students from St. Stephen?s College in Delhi. ?To quickly summarize, the piece criticized the draconian views of the Principal of St. Stephen?s College regarding curfews on women?s dormitories and his stymying of his students? democratic ideals of discussion, protest, and open criticism. ?More broadly, though, the article?s writers seemed to be speaking about the larger stagnant institution of Indian higher education, overseen by a class of rigid administrators represented by this sexist and bigoted Principal, as described by the students. ?The students? frustration was palpable in the text and their story felt to me like a perfect example of what happens when an unstoppable force meets an immovable object. ?Except Indian students are not an unstoppable force. ?Not even close.

In 2007 I was a student at St. Stephen?s College for seven months as part of a study abroad program offered by my home institution, Brown University. ?In as many ways as possible, I tried to become a Stephanian: I joined the football (soccer) team, acted in a school play written and directed by an Indian peer, performed in the school talent show, was a member of the Honors Economics Society, and went to several student events on and off campus. ?More importantly, though, I was a frequenter of the school?s cafe and enjoyed endless chai?s and butter toasts with my Indian peers under the monotonous relief of the fans spinning overhead. ?Most of my friends were 3rd years, like me, and all of them were obviously very bright. I was curious about what their plans were after they graduated. ?With only a few exceptions, they were planning on pursuing second undergraduate degrees at foreign universities.

?Wait, what?! You are studying here for three years just so you can go do it again for four more years?? ?I could not grasp the logic of this. ?What changed my understanding was when I started taking classes at St. Stephen?s College. ?Except for one, they were horrible.

This was not an isolated incident ? all my fellow exchange students (6 from Brown University and even more from Rutgers University in the next apartment block) concurred that the academics were a joke compared to what we were used to back home. ?In one economic history class the professor would enter the room, take attendance, open his notebook, and begin reading. ?He would read his notes word for word while we, his students, copied these notes word for word until the bell sounded. ?Next class he would find the spot where the bell had interrupted him, like a storyteller reading to children and trying to recall where he had last put down the story. ?He would even pause slightly at the end of a long sentence to give us enough time to finish writing before he moved on. ?And this was only when he decided to show up ? many times I arrived on campus to find class abruptly canceled. ?Classmates exchanged cell phone numbers and created phone trees just to circulate word of a canceled class. ?I got a text almost daily about one of my classes. ?My foreigner peers had many similar experiences.

I would sit in class and think to myself ?Can you just photocopy your notebook and give me the notes so I can spend my time doing something less completely useless?? ?I refused to participate. ?Instead, I sat at my desk writing letters to friends.

If it were not for the fact that attendance counted towards my marks, I would have never showed up at all. ?There was no need. ?I calculated the minimum attendance required not to fail, hit that target square on, and still got excellent grades. ?In one political science class the only requirements for the entire period between August and December were two papers, each 2500 words. ?I wrote more intense papers in my U.S. public High School in a month. ?Readings were required but how can this be enforced when there is no discussion that makes students accountable for coming to class prepared? ?The only questions I heard asked during my classes were about whether the material being covered that day would be on the exam. ?Remember, this is not any regular liberal arts college ? St. Stephen?s College is regarded as one of, if not the best, college in India.

The best learning experience I had was hundreds of miles from campus with four other students and one professor on a trek to Kedarnath during October break . ?We had multi-day conversations spanning morality, faith, and history. ?During one memorable overnight bus ride our professor told us the entire Mahabharata epic from memory while we leaned over seats or squatted in the aisle to be closer to the campfire of his voice while the rest of the bus dozed around us. ?The thirst in these students was there and this professor exemplified passionate teaching, but the system is broken. ?Bearing in mind the richness of India?s intellectual tradition, my entire study abroad experience in India, from an academic standpoint, was an enormous disappointment.

To pause for a moment, here is the problem with me talking about this topic: right now many Indians reading this are starting to feel defensive. ??Nationalist? is a term I have heard as a self-description as they defend Mother India from the bigoted, criticizing foreigner. ?They focus on me rather than the problem. ?I have had people de-friend me on Facebook and walk out on meals because I politely expressed an opinion on politics or history that went against the publicly consented ?Indian opinion.? ?For a nation that prides itself on the 17 languages printed on its currency, I am greeted with remarkable intolerance. ?Even after living in India for close to three years, attending an Indian college, working for an Indian company, founding an Indian company, paying taxes in India, and making India my home, I am not Indian enough to speak my mind. ?But in a nation that rivals all others in the breadth of its human diversity, who is Indian enough? ?Because if loyalty and a feeling of patriotism were the barometers for ?Indianness,? rather than skin color or a government document, then I would easily be a dual US-Indian citizen. ?This Indian defensiveness is false nationalism. ?It is not a stance that cares about India, it is one that cares about what others think of India, which is not nationalism. ?That is narcissism.

My voice should be drowned out by the millions around me who are disappointed with how they have been short-changed by the Indian government ? their government. ?Education is one of the most poignant examples of this and serves as great dinner conversation amongst the elite:??The Indian education system is lost in the past and failing India.? Everyone at the table nods, mumbles their concurrence, and cites the most recent Economist article or PricewaterhouseCooper study on the matter in order to masquerade as informed.

?Yes, how sad.?

?Yes, how terrible.?

?Yes, India must fix this.?

Yet amongst my fellow Indian education alumni I mostly hear a deafening silence when it comes to action. ?What is remarkable is that all students in India know what I am talking about. ?They know and are coping: Indian students are taking their useless Indian liberal arts degrees and going abroad to get real ones that signify a real education. ?A real education being one that challenges the intellect and questions paradigms, not one of rote memorization and conformity. ?Or, as was the case with my Indian friends at Brown, they skip India altogether. ?Sure, I took some unimpressive classes at Brown and no curriculum is perfect, but Indian students should be demanding more. ?Much more.

The article I read by the Stephenian students was a step, but too little of one and in the wrong direction. ?Dorm curfews? ?The students of St. Stephen?s College need to dig deeper and question why they are in those dorms in the first place. ?Griping about the loss of their democratic rights in school? ?Wake up, students have no recognized rights. ?If they did, then their right to an education would be respected, but the status quo says otherwise. ?How dare they discuss it, says the system.

To provide another anecdote, I used to interview Indian students applying to Brown University. ?While the Admissions Office says this forms a small component of the application relative to other factors like grades, activities, test scores, and essays, they nevertheless like to arrange an alumni interview whenever they can. ?The purpose is to be conversational and get a sense for the human who is obscured by the very impersonal scores and grades; it is not meant to be an interrogation. ?The applicant is also encouraged to ask me questions and learn more about Brown. ?In all the interviews I did, only one applicant truly inspired me to write a glowing review of our encounter. ?Similarly, I constantly get asked by Indian parents what the secret is to getting in to schools like Brown. ?I have even been hired by a few parents to consult for them and assist their son or daughter in the application process.

What consistently struck me about these students was their (and their parents?) cookie cutter attempts to craft the perfect applicant. ?That in itself was not remarkable ? High School students all over the US do this ? but what I found different was the lack of depth. ?The students spent hours at tutorials to ace the Board Exams and maybe had an activity outside of the classroom here and there, but there was nothing, except in that one outstanding student, that provided an outlet for their personality to shine through. ?I particularly focused on helping the students with their essays (I never wrote for them, only edited) and coaxed them to describe why they had done some activity or loved some class. ?Dead stares and long telephone pauses ensued. ?There seemed to be no spark ? no inquisitive magnetism pulling them towards exploring the unknown. ?I was teleported back to the economic history class I took at St. Stephen?s and I felt like the professor: these students would look up from their notebooks at me and want to know what to copy next. ?These students were adapting to be seen as the best within a broken system ? it was an overwhelmingly depressing epiphany.

In my opinion, the students of India have two choices: either let the government sort itself out or take ownership of the problem themselves. ?Mass protest against the inertia of regressive forces is an atavistic trait in young Indians. ?Indeed, modern India was born out of such actions. ?Moreover, many of the cultural revolutions throughout history have had students waving the banners. ?What I find inspiring about St. Stephen?s students writing the article I referenced at the beginning is that they have the most to lose in this fight and are starting to fight anyway.

Fact: every student at St. Stephen?s is part of India?s elite. ?While there is a reservation system for the admission of scheduled castes and others residing at the bottom of India?s socio-economic pyramid, once every student at St. Stephen?s enrolls they become a member of the elite, irrespective of background. ?With that name stamped on their diploma, the world becomes easier because they are part of ?the club.? ?For example, an idiot who graduates from Harvard and learned nothing probably has an easier chance of getting a great job than the genius from an unheard of college. ?Sad but mostly true. ?The same can be said with respect to the Ivy League, Oxford and Cambridge, and elite schools all over the world. ?It would be easy for St. Stephen?s students to not challenge the system and continue to move down the conveyor belt because, relative to other schools, their actual education matters less; the name and reputation of the school relieves some of the weight that the student?s intellect would otherwise have to carry.

The opposite side of this same coin, though, is the upside St. Stephen?s students could reap. ?St. Stephen?s students also have the most to gain from change. ?Because St. Stephen?s College is such a great school, it can attract great names and create a great curriculum. ?Imagine if my teachers had actually taught their classes? ?Whoa. ?Instead of just the promise and illusion of an amazing liberal arts education, St. Stephen?s students would get that education. ?If the end is knowledge, then St. Stephen?s students win big.

We are entering a year of politics and elections. ?With elections comes the possibility of change. ?The most troubling line in the student?s article was in reference to the ?wielding of disproportionate power by the Principle,? which was:??Education in India awaits a rescue from the hands of such figures.?

Who, may I ask, do you hope to be your rescuers? ?Your representatives in government? ?Your parents? The characters from Rang De Basanti??There is a window available if only there existed the resolve and determination within India?s students to seize it, which remains to be seen. ?One lesson that no college is very good at teaching is that in life you should not expect others to fight your battles for you. ?While higher education is a public good and has champions in the private and public world, students are the ultimate stakeholders. ?If the students at St. Stephen?s College want to practice the potent words that they wrote in Kafila, then it is time to stand up and be counted. ?If not, the only people who suffer will be themselves.

In addition to being an endless victim of name/place confusion when living in Mumbai, Thane is a journalist and editor currently calling the road his home. ?You can follow him @ThaneRichard

Like this:

Like Loading...

Source: http://kafila.org/2013/04/30/academic-excellence-and-st-stephens-college-a-response-by-thane-richard/

adastra holocaust remembrance day chesapeake energy dick clark death yom hashoah yolo liquidmetal

Obama: US still not sure who used chem weapons

President Barack Obama answers questions during his new conference in the Brady Press Briefing Room of the White House in Washington, Tuesday, April 30, 2013 in Washington. The president said the US doesn't know how chemical weapons were used in Syria or by whom. (AP Photo/Pablo Martinez Monsivais)

President Barack Obama answers questions during his new conference in the Brady Press Briefing Room of the White House in Washington, Tuesday, April 30, 2013 in Washington. The president said the US doesn't know how chemical weapons were used in Syria or by whom. (AP Photo/Pablo Martinez Monsivais)

President Barack Obama answers questions during his new conference in the Brady Press Briefing Room of the White House in Washington, Tuesday, April 30, 2013. The president strongly suggested Tuesday he'd consider military action against Syria if it can be confirmed that President Bashar Assad's government used chemical weapons in the two-year-old civil war. (AP Photo/Pablo Martinez Monsivais)

President Barack Obama gestures as he speaks at a news conference in the Brady Press Briefing Room at the White House in Washington,Tuesday, April 30, 2013. The president said the US doesn't know how or when chemical weapons were used in Syria or who used them. (AP Photo/Charles Dharapak)

President Barack Obama answers questions during his new conference in the Brady Press Briefing Room of the White House in Washington, Tuesday, April 30, 2013 in Washington. The president said he's asked Pentagon for range of options if President Assad has used chemical weapons in Syria. (AP Photo/Pablo Martinez Monsivais)

President Barack Obama arrives for a news conference in the Brady Press Briefing Room of the White House in Washington, Tuesday, April 30, 2013. (AP Photo/Charles Dharapak)

WASHINGTON (AP) ? President Barack Obama strongly suggested Tuesday he'd consider military action against Syria if it can be confirmed that President Bashar Assad's government used chemical weapons in the two-year-old civil war.

At a White House news conference, the president also defended the FBI's work in monitoring the activities in recent years of one of the men accused in the deadly bombing at the Boston Marathon two weeks ago.

At a question and answer session that ranged from immigration legislation to recent intelligence cooperation with Russia, the president several times chided, criticized or dismissed his Republican critics. Asked about one senator who recently said national security protections have deteriorated since he became president, Obama said, Sen. Lindsey "Graham is not right on this issue, although I'm sure he generated some headlines."

Asked about Syria, the president said that while there is evidence that chemical weapons were used inside the country, "we don't know when they were used, how they were used. We don't know who used them. We don't have a chain of custody that establishes" exactly what happened.

If it can be established that the Syrian government used chemical weapons, he added, "we would have to rethink the range of options that are available to us."

"Obviously there are options to me that are on the shelf right now that we have not deployed," he said, noting that he had asked Pentagon planners last year for additional possibilities. He declined to provide details.

Obama responded with slight ridicule and humor when he was asked if he still had the political juice to push his agenda through Congress after an early second-term defeat on gun control legislation.

"Golly, I might just as well pack up and go home," he parried his questioner. Paraphrasing Mark Twain, he said, "Rumors of my demise may be a little exaggerated at this point." He expressed confidence that Congress would approve sweeping immigration legislation that he is seeking.

He also renewed his call for lawmakers to replace across-the-board federal spending cuts. The administration favors a comprehensive plan to reduce deficits through targeted spending cuts and higher taxes.

Asked about the FBI's investigation into a possible terrorist threat posed in the past by Tamerlan Tsarnaev, a suspect in the Boston Marathon bombings who died in an escape attempt, the president said, "Based on what I've seen so far, the FBI performed its duties , the Department of Homeland Security did what it was supposed to be doing."

"But this is hard stuff," he said of the work needed to ferret out security threats at home.

He also said that "Russians have been very cooperative with us since the Boston bombing."

The bombing suspects are Russian natives who immigrated to the Boston area. Russian authorities told U.S. officials before the bombings they had concerns about the family, but Moscow has revealed details of wiretapped conversations only since the attack.

Obama had scarcely completed his news conference when Graham, the Republican South Carolina senator, responded to his comment about national security.

"With all due respect, Mr. President, Benghazi and Boston are compelling examples of how our national security systems have deteriorated on your watch." He referred to the attack that killed three Americans at a U.S. diplomatic post in Libya last year, as well as the marathon bombing

Asked about a topic that links terrorism and his Obama's legislative efforts, he said he would "re-engage with Congress" on his goal of closing the prison for detainees at Guantanamo in Cuba. As a candidate for the White House in 2007 and 2008, Obama called for closing the base, which was set up as part of President George W. Bush's response to the terror attacks on Sept. 11, 2001. Lawmakers objected and the facility remains open.

Asked about a hunger strike by some detainees, he said, "I don't want these individuals to die," and he said the Pentagon was doing what it could to manage the situation.

Obama also noted that several suspected terrorists have been tried and found in U.S. federal courts, an answer to his congressional critics who maintain that detainees must be tried in special courts if the United States is to maximize its ability to prevent future attacks.

On another contentious issue, the president said a variety of Republicans was working to foil the final implementation of the health care law he pushed through Congress three years ago.

He said GOP lawmakers want to repeal the law and some Republican governors don't want to have their states participate in establishing insurance pools where the uninsured can find coverage. In other cases, Republican legislatures object when governors are willing to go along.

Even so, he said, "we will implement" the law, although he conceded there will be glitches along the way.

"Despite all the hue and cry and sky-is-falling predictions about this stuff, if you've already got health insurance, then the part of Obamacare that affects you is already in place," he added.

The first question to Obama concerned Syria and the reported use of chemical weapons.

Administration officials said recently that intelligence analysts had "varying degrees of confidence" in a conclusion that Assad's government has deployed sarin gas against civilians.

Obama said the administration was using all its resources to determine the facts about a weapon that he has said would be a "game changer" for U.S. policy in the war.

"If we end up rushing to judgment without hard, effective evidence ... we can find ourselves in a position where we can't marshal the international community in support of what we do," he said. "It's important for us to do this in a prudent way."

He did not say so, but one of the enduring controversies from Bush's administration was the assertion ? never proven, but used to justify the invasion of Iraq ? that Saddam Hussein possessed weapons of mass destruction.

The Obama administration long ago called for Assad to step down and pave the way for a new government, but Obama has resisted calls from some Republicans in Congress to send U.S. military aid to the rebels or commit U.S. military resources directly.

The hour-long news conference concluded with a post-script.

Obama had stepped away from the lectern when he heard a shouted question about Jason Collins, the professional basketball player who made a pioneering announcement on Monday that he is gay.

Obama said he had spoken with Collins and "told him I couldn't be prouder of him."

"One of the extraordinary measures of progress that we've seen in this country has been the recognition that the LGBT community deserves full equality, not just partial equality, not just tolerance but a recognition that they're wholly a part of the American family," he said.

Associated Press

Source: http://hosted2.ap.org/APDEFAULT/89ae8247abe8493fae24405546e9a1aa/Article_2013-04-30-Obama/id-59120a7a153844f4a667c2f8c0a7029d

Grandparents Day 2012 army wives 60 minutes go daddy Tom Kenny Long Island Medium Alfonso Ribeiro

Recent U.S. college graduates disillusioned, underemployed: poll

NEW YORK (Reuters) - More than 40 percent of recent U.S. college graduates are underemployed or need more training to get on a career track, a poll released on Tuesday showed.

The online survey of 1,050 workers who finished school in the past two years and 1,010 who will receive their degree in 2013 also found that many graduates, some heavily in debt because of the cost of their education, say they are in jobs that do not require a college degree.

Thirty-four percent said they had student loans of $30,000 or less, while 17 percent owed between $30,000 to $50,000.

"For our nation's youngest workers, as well as for the workforce at large, there is a real need for employers to reexamine how they hire, train and develop their employees," said Katherine Lavelle, of the global management consulting firm Accenture, which conducted the survey.

Nearly half, 42 percent, of recent graduates expect they will need an advanced degree to further their career and almost a quarter are already planning to take graduate courses.

More than half of graduates said it was difficult finding a job, but 39 percent were employed by the time they left college. Sixty eight percent said they are working full time, while 16 percent are in part-time positions.

The top industries that graduates wanted to work in were education, media and entertainment and healthcare.

Just over half, 53 percent, of graduates found full-time jobs in their field of study.

In addition to being underemployed many graduates thought they would have done better in the job market if they had studied a different major, and more than half also intended to go back to school within the next five years.

The survey uncovered a gap between what students expect to earn in their first job and their actual salary. Only 15 percent of this year's graduates think they will earn less than $25,000 but a third of recent graduates said they make that amount or less.

(Reporting by Patricia Reaney; Editing by Cynthia Osterman)

Source: http://news.yahoo.com/recent-u-college-graduates-disillusioned-underemployed-poll-171942713.html

luol deng culkin wooly mammoth no child left behind no child left behind neurofibromatosis steve jobs fbi file